Wow! Ugandan
President Yoweri Museveni has just signed a bill which criminalises indecency and promotion of pornography.
It is the law on dressing that is specifically targeted towards women as it
forbids women from wearing clothes like miniskirts and cleavage- revealing
blouses that excite sexual cravings in public, unless for educational and
medical purposes or during sports or cultural events. Uganda has led the way
and very soon I am anticipating the Zambian moral torch bearers to start
requesting government to do the same.
Ugandan
lawmakers think that the banning of miniskirts and other revealing clothing
will in some way reduce the immorality levels in that country. I would like to
see how successful this strategy is. This law in other words can be interpreted
to mean that it is there to protect men who have raging hormones that they
cannot control and we men are the victims. It is a stupid excuse to give men
that they rape, sexually assault and defile children because of a dress code. Really. This law has even gone so far as
allowing men to apprehend any woman who dresses indecently, under the citizen’s
arrest clause. The question to ask is who among the group of men will decide
what is indecent. What one man perceives as indecent may not be the perception
of another therefore women will now be victims of perception.
This debate
has been creeping into Zambia slowly, where certain factions have been
demanding government to place a law that will ban ladies wearing revealing
clothes. Their stance is that it is not Zambian culture and women should be
decently dressed. They should be wrapped in a chitenge and not revealing their thighs, cleavage and G-strings. We
are a Christian nation after all. The use of Zambia as a Christian nation as an
excuse why certain decisions should be done away with absolutely makes me sick.
It is fine if people say that they cannot stand the miniskirt because they get
aroused, or that it is a personal choice not to support the women wearing them.
However, to state that they should not be worn because Zambia is a Christian
nation is ridiculous.
Let’s say that yes Zambia is a Christian nation, so why not
criminalise fornication, adultery, lying, etc, while we are at it. Why aren’t people
marching the streets demanding that all liars, fornicators and adulterers are locked
up? Why should we choose the bits and pieces of the Christian faith that
supports our argument and do away with the rest. Personally, I have better
things to do than to care whether a woman is wearing a miniskirt or cleavage
revealing clothing. However, what I don’t understand is a woman who wears a
miniskirt and has to keep pulling it down or cleavage revealing top and having
to cover it with the hand. Why wear it in
the first place then? There is a reason it is called a miniskirt in the
first place isn’t it. I do feel that dressing whether for a man or woman should
be decent, but I will not impose what I think is decent on others.
The banning of miniskirts and revealing clothing in Uganda is
clearly misplaced. Perhaps the stance should have been to teach men to respect
women and not treat them like objects of our sexual desire. How about showing
men that a miniskirt or revealing clothing is not the reason why they will rape
or sexually assault a woman but rather it is their own sick mind and that is
what they should work on changing. Uganda and Africa as a whole has far more
pressing needs such as poverty, corruption, HIV/AIDS, tribalism that need to be
addressed than placing what a woman choses to wear top of the agenda.